Annoying Liberals
Saturday, September 29, 2007
It's been a while since we've had a liberal around for intelligent discourse. Of late, though, we have had a barking moonbat who seems to get his talking points from Cindy Sheehag, MoveOn and the "Truthers". OK, well so much for intelligent discourse, but there's always fun to be had slapping a lib around with the Immortal Cluebat, especially one that comes to a gun fight armed with a slingshot.
These liberals have no concept of reality. They love to tell you that constitutionalists are a dying breed, and wow, what a great thing that is. They love to tell you President Reagan was a moron, despite all his achievements while in office. They love to tell you that war is illegal. In a nutshell, to them the laughable is reality, and reality is, well, they wouldn't know reality if it slapped them in the face.
How many liberals do you know that encourage race-baiting, giving their full support to racist statements and diatribes that come from the likes of Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan, and Robert Byrd?
How many liberals do you know that champion the "rights" of millions of illegal aliens who refuse to obey our laws, organize violent gangs in our country, and have openly asserted that America is part of THEIR country that they are going to take back?
How many liberals do you know that openly believe that the purpose of government is to provide the opportunity for a livelihood and way of life for the citizens?
How many liberals do you know that are so completely taken over with Bush Derangement Syndrome that they can't help but blame this President for everything that they see as wrong, including high gas prices?
How many liberals do you know that openly try to accuse the president of starting a war for personal gain (implying that any gains should be redistributed to the people)?
How many liberals do you know that openly advocate nationalizing everything from health care to the price of milk?
How many liberals do you know that openly advocate high taxes so that they can decide who to give the money to?
How many liberals do you know that expect the rest of us to assume that everything can and should be done by the federal government?
How many liberals do you know that treat wealthy people and their money with disdain?
How many liberals do you know that expect the federal government to run all of the schools?
How many liberals do you know that justify the imposition of their socialist agenda by invoking children?
How many liberals do you know that constantly bemoan anyone's practice of religious freedom?
How many liberals do you know that want a centralized government to run all of the above?
These are all things about liberals that annoy me. What's worse is that many of them come here championing these things with no idea how ridiculous they are being by doing so, and refuse to engage in a meaningful discussion of any issues. It's all a bunch of name-calling and lying on their part.
Constitutionalists are part of a growing movement in America. A movement that is marked by recognition of the failed socialist policies of the 20th century and a desire to champion the ideals of the Founding Fathers. A great thing indeed, and lucky for us, the libs don't even see it coming.
President Reagan was a genius, and an immensely popular one at that. Demonizing him only discredits the liberals. It's a fool's game to label a man a moron when he virtually single-handedly brought down the most evil empire the world had ever seen (ok ok ... Marge and JP helped ... ), brought a balanced budget to within reach by cutting taxes, and was smart enough to find a way to win re-election with almost a clean sweep.
Wars are going to happen. It's a simple fact of the world. No one likes them, but when you are attacked by ruthless warriors, you must respond as ruthless warriors. The best way to prevent war is to be more prepared for it than your enemies and be prepared to prove it when they test you. Mr. Bush's unpopularity with regard to the war is not a positive response to cronies like Cindy Sheehag who oppose the war because the guy at the helm is less of a socialist than they are, but because he stopped fighting long before it was appropriate to do so. He failed to cut off the hand that was feeding the terrorists, as an Iraqi friend of mine once suggested. This president's willingness to answer the terrorists' declaration of war with rockets and bombs is admirable. His failure to keep fighting as appropriate is his downfall in this regard.
Of course, no liberal will ever admit that - at least publicly; but watch the leading Donk presidential candidates put forth their plans for the War on Terror, and listen closely to what they will entail. You're not going to be looking at a cut-n-run strategy from any of them that really want to win.
Libs are annoying. Funny, but annoying. Some of the best laughs I have ever had have come at the expense of liberals being stupid. Remember when Bill Clinton came on TV and told all of America that the Blizzard of '96 was caused by "global warming"?? I almost suffocated that day.
Funny, but annoying.
RWR