Why Scott Brown Matters  

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

For all that's been out and about in the blogosphere these last few weeks, you'd think Scott Brown was the second coming of Ronald Reagan. He's not. In fact, from the standpoint of governing, Scott Brown isn't much better than John McCain, if any better at all (or, for that matter, his opponent). However, there are some points about Scott Brown that are very important, despite my correctly arguing that it is best to take a more sober approach when it comes to supporting a non-conservative Republican for office:

1. Scott Brown is running for office in Massachusetts, and for a Senate seat that has been held by not only a socialist/communist/fascist Democrat for several decades, but has been held by THE SAME socialist/communist/fascist Democrat for several decades. Any move to the right, however small, is a huge leap for the "People's Republic of Massachusetts". Support for the Libertarian is a joke in this race. We are talking about Massachusetts here.

2. Scott Brown's success in this campaign - win, lose, or draw - has energized conservatives (as if the Tea Party movement hadn't already gotten us going) to the point where there may now be some motivation in areas where more conservative results are possible. That can only be a good thing.

To suggest Scott Brown is the conservative answer to everything is to not have read his campaign page. Sure, he's vowed to be the 41st vote against ObamaCare, but his track record in Massachusetts suggests RepubliCare may not be out of the question for him. He did vote FOR RomneyCare as state Senator and was one if its bigger proponents. Government healthcare a la Republicans isn't going to be any more legal than a la Democrats.

A move to the right in Taxachusetts? Heck, you get that even if he just makes it close. Motivating conservatives? I'd say conservatives, particularly those of the constitutionalist variety, could use some motivating.

In these ways, conservatives have already won thanks to Scott Brown. His actually winning would be gravy, though its taste will likely not be as sweet as many want you to think it will be.

RWR



Comments (6)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
It would be nice...and historic for a Republican, even a RINO to win that seat, RWR. One thing that is helping him is Coakley's social gaffes which illustrate how glaringly out of touch she is with the Massachusetts electorate. A biggie:she called Curt Schilling (a Brown supporter, staunch Conservative, and huge Mass. hero-he of the 2004 Red Sox who pitched in the WS with a torn tendon in his ankle-we LOVE this guy) a YANKEE FAN....ooops... ;) I love it when the left shows its true colors
Yep.

However, my thinking has changed upon further consideration.

Conservatives have not won - yet.

There will be no conservative win attributable to Scott Brown until a conservative wins somewhere because of Scott's win.

RWR
I think that the greatest point of note here is that, like NJ, Mass. has given Obama a very short leash to walk his dog with. This is however, as you have rightly noted, one giant step for Mass, but is absolutely zero, zilch, and meaningless for anything to the right of Ole Juan McCain, who hardly even pretends to be Conservative, which isn't even close to being Constitutional. The possibilities are, however, exciting to behold!
1 reply · active 794 weeks ago
Exciting and just a bit scary, too, Sage. The Left is not going to let go of power without some casualties...
What's really important is that more and more Americans are educating themselves on the Constitution and the founding fathers. I've been doing a lot of that over the years but it really ramped up recently. So much so that for Christmas I received a leather bound pocket sized book that contains the Constitution, Declaration of Independence and several of the supporting documents that led to both. My friends joke that while some carry copies of the New Testament, I carry my own Bible, The Constitution.
movie : I Think My Ass Is Bleeding an cry Please Stop .

Post a new comment

Comments by