Bachmann Throws Down the Gauntlet  

Saturday, March 12, 2011


Michelle Bachmann
Natural Born Citizen
(and willing to prove it)


Palin wannabe or not.

Lousy speaker or not.

If Michelle Bachmann runs for President of the United States, she will present her birth certificate in the first debate to prove her eligibility.
I'll tell you one thing, if I was ever to run for president of the United States, I think the first thing I would do in the first debate is offer my birth certificate so we can get that off the table.
We will all know first hand that we are dealing with a constitutionally eligible candidate in Michelle Bachmann.

Does that make her the best for the job? No. Does that mean she has my vote? No.

However, it does mean that if she does in fact win the election, she holds the office legally, at least from the perspective of her status as a natural born citizen of the United States of America.

The current occupant has yet to show anything of substance.

RWR

Cross-posted at The Second American Revolution.



Comments (7)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Now if we can teach her where Lexington and Concord are.
We hear of the term 'bottom line' often. It originated by looking at the bottom line of a financial statement to determine how well an organization is doing. With capitalism taking over from barter systems, figures indicating profit or loss became the measure of how things were going. It also can mean anything that points to the ultimate value placed on something. Most relationships are not measured in dollars but there is a bottom line that determines an answer of the value of the relationship.

The bottom line might not be a comparison but a goal to point toward or work for. Your goal might be to become a professional ball player, and you sacrifice a great deal to reach that goal. However, in our society, if you reach it, you are richly rewarded as long as you keep that level of talent. However, our society will not tolerate reckless disregard for others. Many professional players forget the point of a sport and concentrate only on fame and fortune.

At the start of ball games, "The Star-Spangled Banner" is played and/or sung. It has become a tradition, and for many people, it has no meaning unless you happen to be a soldier defending the freedoms we take fore granted. The pledge of allegiance is often muttered as many nice words without thinking of the bottom-line "with liberty and justice for all." What does it mean to be an American?

We look at our struggling legal system and wonder if justice is the bottom line or winning is. When lawyers are not paid unless they win, it seems that the bottom line is the dollars for the attorneys and their clients rather than justice. What happened to "tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth"?

What can we expect from another generation if the lesson they learn from us is that the most important thing in life is to take care of No. 1, namely ourselves? We are not all gifted or educated equally. We are part of smaller groups divided by many criteria -- geographical area, income, race, size, sex, family, etc. Our bottom line of life is affected by all these things. We need everyone to make this a better place. We need people with a heart to care as well as people to make us think of priorities and principles of living together.

Many organizations have a mission statement to define their purpose. It is a vision about what possibilities are. Maybe we should start with our mission statement of this great country. "We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility ... establish this Constitution for the United States of America." We need believers and doubters, whatever the cause, to keep us honest to ourselves and to one another. Without these principles as our bottom line, we will find chaos become the bottom line.
Before you all go goo-goo,gah-gah over this political siren, please remember that she was a former member of the Democratic party, and was a federal tax litigation lawyer before switching shirts to become the talking head she is today. She, along with the other members of the "outlaw" Congress, including Ron Paul, confirmed the electoral college vote that placed the Red usurper in the White house on 1/20/09, full well knowing the illegal status that he carried for that office, without a word of protest to the contrary. She has never sponsored a bill to remove the US from the its unconstitutional membership in the UN. She has never invoked the Constitution in respect to the illegal status of the Federal Reserve's printing of fiat currency as American dollars, nor has she ever supported any bill sponsored for its removal. As far as I am concerned, she is the enemy; a wolf in sheep's clothing.
I figure the repubs are going to run their usual nutless candidate for President.

So, it may as well be a women.
There's no goo-goo-gah-gah here. No one is under any illusions about Bachmann or anyone else.

However, If anything listed above is even going to be mentioned, movement in that direction must first be made.

If we're not going to get the right candidate, and let's face it we aren't, we might as well have someone to push against that has an idea what we are talking about.

Of course there's that "the enemy I know" advantage we have with the usurper.

RWR
Here we go again, heading to the voting booth holding our proverbial noses, closing our eyes, and... "got hope"? Please, spare me the details, and hand me the toilet paper!
Well we do have a year and a half to think it over.

RWR

Post a new comment

Comments by